Physical Chemistry · Part 5 of 9

The Hydrogen Atom

Quantum Chemistry, Part 5 · 10 sections · about 18,293 words · CSIR-NET Chemical Sciences, GATE Chemistry & IIT-JAM

The hydrogen atom is the only atom quantum mechanics solves exactly, and every orbital picture in chemistry descends from it. This part does the full solution — the separation, the radial equation, the three quantum numbers falling out as conditions rather than assumptions — and then spends as much time on what the answers mean, because that is what the exam tests: nodes, radial distribution functions, the difference between ψ2 and 4πr2ψ2, and why the 2s and 2p levels are degenerate here and nowhere else. Two layers on every section: a slow, hand-held beginner path and a research-grade advanced/reference path.

The 10 sections in Part 5

  • 1The two-body problem and the reduced mass Free below
  • 2The Coulomb potential and separation in spherical polars
  • 3The radial equation, the Laguerre polynomials, and where n comes from
  • 4The three quantum numbers and the constraints among them
  • 5Radial wavefunctions and radial nodes
  • 6Angular functions, real orbitals and the shapes you draw
  • 7The radial distribution function, and why its maximum is not where ψ² peaks
  • 8Expectation values, the size of the atom, and the virial theorem
  • 9The spectrum, selection rules, hydrogen-like ions and fine structure
  • 10Where this leads — a pointer to Part 6

The two-body problem and the reduced mass

Free extract

Section E.1 of Part 5, reproduced in full from the book — figures and all. No sign-in, no paywall on this section.

Beginner layer

Two particles orbiting each other look like one particle orbiting a fixed point, provided you give it the right mass. That mass is μ.

A hydrogen atom is two particles: a proton and an electron, both free to move, attracting each other. Writing the Schrödinger equation for that honestly gives an equation in six coordinates — three for each particle — which nobody can solve directly.

The escape is a change of variables you already know from classical mechanics. Instead of tracking where each particle is, track two other things: where the centre of mass is, and where the electron is relative to the proton. When you do this, the Hamiltonian splits cleanly into two independent pieces:

Ĥ = ĤCM + Ĥrel = −(ℏ²/2Mtot)∇²CM − (ℏ²/2μ)∇²r + V(r)

The first piece describes the atom as a whole drifting through space. It is a free particle; its energy is ordinary kinetic energy and it has nothing to do with chemistry, so we discard it. The second piece is a one-particle problem: a single fictitious particle of mass μ, at position r relative to the origin, moving in the potential V(r). That is the problem we solve for the rest of the part.

Reduced mass, μ: the effective mass of the relative motion of two bodies, μ = m1m2/(m1 + m2). It is always smaller than either mass, and when one body is far heavier than the other it tends to the mass of the lighter one.
μ = meM / (me + M) = me / (1 + me/M)

For hydrogen, M/me = 1836.15, so μ = 0.9994557 me. The correction is about one part in 1836 — a fraction of a tenth of a percent. You may reasonably ask why anybody bothers. The answer is that spectroscopy measures wavelengths to eight or nine significant figures, so a correction in the fourth figure is enormous by that standard, and the difference between hydrogen and deuterium spectra is entirely this effect.

Two bodies in, one body out — the reduced-mass trickWhat nature hands you: two moving particlesWhat you solve: one particle, one fixed centrelab originr1r2r = r2 − r1penucleus, mass Melectron, mass me6 coordinates,both particles move×centre of massdrifts off — discardedrμone fictitious particle ofreduced mass μ, in V(r)3 coordinates; only the relative motion is leftexactμ = m1m2/(m1+m2) = 0.999456 me for ¹H. The change is small —but it is the whole difference between RH = 109677.58 cm⁻¹ and R = 109737.32 cm⁻¹.
Why the hydrogen atom is a one-particle problem at all. The real system has two moving charges and six coordinates. Changing to the centre-of-mass position and the relative vector r = r2r1 splits the Hamiltonian exactly into a free-particle term for the centre of mass (which we throw away — it is just the atom drifting across the room) and a one-particle term for a fictitious particle of mass μ moving in the Coulomb field. Nothing is approximated at this step. Every ‘me’ in the final answers should strictly be a μ.
Advanced / reference layer

The coordinate change in full, and what it does and does not assume.

Start with the exact two-particle Hamiltonian, particle 1 the nucleus and particle 2 the electron:

Ĥ = −(ℏ²/2m1)∇²1 − (ℏ²/2m2)∇²2 + V(|r2r1|)

Define the centre-of-mass and relative vectors

R = (m1r1 + m2r2) / (m1 + m2) ,   r = r2r1

The chain rule, applied twice and with some patience, converts the sum of the two Laplacians into

(1/m1)∇²1 + (1/m2)∇²2 = (1/Mtot)∇²R + (1/μ)∇²r

with Mtot = m1 + m2 and 1/μ = 1/m1 + 1/m2. The crucial structural point is that the cross terms cancel exactly. There is no residual ∇R·∇r coupling. That is why the separation is exact rather than approximate, and it is why the reduced-mass step is not an approximation at all — unlike, say, the Born–Oppenheimer separation of Part 7, which looks superficially similar and is an approximation.

Since V depends on r alone, the total wavefunction factorises as Ψ(R,r) = Χ(R)ψ(r) with Etotal = Etrans + E. The translational factor is a plane wave with a continuous energy; we set it aside and never mention it again. Everything called ‘the energy of the hydrogen atom’ from here on is the internal energy E.

Three consequences worth carrying forward:

  • Every me in the standard results should be a μ. The Bohr radius, the Rydberg constant and the energies all carry it. Most textbooks quietly write me and mean ‘in the infinite-nuclear-mass limit’.
  • Isotope effects in atomic spectra are pure reduced-mass effects. Deuterium's lines are shifted from hydrogen's by the ratio μDH, and that shift is how deuterium was discovered by Urey in 1931–32.
  • Positronium (e⁺e⁻) has μ = me/2 exactly, so every energy level is half the hydrogen value and every wavelength is doubled. It is a favourite exam variant precisely because it makes you show that you know where μ enters.
RM = R · μ/me = R / (1 + me/M)
QuantityValueWhere it comes from
R10973731.568 m⁻¹ = 109737.32 cm⁻¹infinite nuclear mass
RH10967758.34 m⁻¹ = 109677.58 cm⁻¹R × 0.99945568
RD10970742.66 m⁻¹ = 109707.43 cm⁻¹R × 0.99972763
μH/me0.99945568Mp/me = 1836.153
μD/me0.99972763Md/me = 3670.483
μPs/me0.5positronium, both masses equal
Values computed from CODATA particle masses. The three Rydberg constants differ in the fourth significant figure — invisible in a chemistry calculation, glaring in an atomic spectrum.

Predict the isotope shift of the Hα line (deuterium vs hydrogen) Medium

The idea. Every hydrogenic transition wavenumber is proportional to the Rydberg constant of that isotope, and the Rydberg constant is proportional to μ. So ν̃D/ν̃H = RD/RH = μDH — the same ratio for every line in the spectrum.
Step 1 — the ratio. μDH = 0.99972763 / 0.99945568 = 1.00027210.
Step 2 — the Hα wavenumber for hydrogen. Hα is n = 3 → 2, so ν̃ = RH(1/2² − 1/3²) = 109677.58 × (0.25 − 0.11111) cm⁻¹ = 109677.58 × 0.138889 = 15233.00 cm⁻¹.
Step 3 — convert to wavelength. λ = 1/ν̃ = 1/15233.00 cm = 6.5647 × 10⁻⁵ cm = 656.47 nm (in vacuum).
Step 4 — the deuterium line. λD = λH × (μHD) = 656.47 × (1/1.00027210) = 656.29 nm.
Step 5 — the shift. Δλ = 656.47 − 656.29 = 0.18 nm, the deuterium line lying at shorter wavelength. That is a comfortably resolvable splitting on a good grating spectrograph, and it is exactly the observation Urey made.
Sanity check on the direction. D has the heavier nucleus → larger μ → deeper levels → larger transition energy → shorter wavelength. Heavier isotope, bluer line. Always.

⚠ Common mistakes & exam traps

  • Forgetting μ entirely and then being surprised that RH ≠ R. If a question quotes 109677.6 cm⁻¹ it is talking about hydrogen; 109737.3 cm⁻¹ is the infinite-mass constant. They are not the same number and a question that supplies one and expects the other is testing exactly this.
  • Using μ = m1m2/(m1−m2). The denominator is a sum. A quick check: μ must always be smaller than the smaller of the two masses.
  • Thinking the reduced-mass step is an approximation. It is exact. What is approximate is neglecting the centre-of-mass motion — and even that is not an approximation, it is a separation of a degree of freedom we do not care about.
  • Applying the μ correction to Z but not to a0. The Bohr radius itself contains μ: a0 = 4πε0ℏ²/μe². For a consistent finite-mass calculation, correct everything or nothing.
Easy
Calculate the reduced mass of a positronium atom (an electron bound to a positron) in units of me, and hence its ground-state energy in eV.
Show solution
Both particles have mass me, so μ = me·me/(2me) = me/2. Energies scale linearly with μ, so E1 = −13.6057/2 = −6.803 eV. Every positronium wavelength is twice the corresponding hydrogen wavelength. (The Bohr radius doubles too, to 2a0 = 105.8 pm, since a0 ∝ 1/μ.)
Med
A muonic hydrogen atom replaces the electron with a muon, mμ = 206.768 me. Find the reduced mass in units of me and the radius of the n = 1 orbit.
Show solution
μ = (206.768 × 1836.153)/(206.768 + 1836.153) me = 379658.1/2042.921 = 185.84 me. Since a ∝ 1/μ, the characteristic radius is a0/185.84 = 52.918/185.84 pm = 0.2847 pm = 284.7 fm. This is only about 340 times the proton charge radius (0.841 fm), which is why muonic hydrogen is used to measure the proton's charge radius. Note that here the ‘small correction’ is a factor of 186 — the reduced mass is not always a footnote.
Hard
Tritium (³H, nuclear mass 5496.92 me) and protium both emit a Lyman-α line. Which is at longer wavelength, and by how many picometres?
Show solution
μT/me = 5496.92/5497.92 = 0.99981811; μH/me = 0.99945568. Tritium's reduced mass is larger, so its levels are deeper, its transition energy larger and its wavelength shorter. Protium's Lyman-α is the longer. λH = 4/(3RH) = 121.567 nm. Ratio λTH = μHT = 0.99945568/0.99981811 = 0.99963755, giving λT = 121.523 nm. The difference is 0.044 nm = 44 pm. The general rule for these questions: heavier nucleus → larger μ → larger ν̃ → shorter λ.

Read the rest of Part 5

The remaining 9 sections of this part — The Coulomb potential and separation in spherical polars, The radial equation, the Laguerre polynomials, and where n comes from, The three quantum numbers and the constraints among them… — and all nine parts of Quantum Chemistry are part of ChemVidya Full Access, along with the other books, 55 Study Notes and 6,000+ practice questions.

See plans Open in the app

Continue through Quantum Chemistry

Related Physical Study Notes