Inorganic Chemistry · Part 7 of 9 · Free

Stability & Thermodynamics — formula sheet

Every key expression and definition from Coordination Chemistry, Part 7, on one page. Free to read, no sign-in.

Key expressions

overall constant from stepwise constants
β_n = K₁ K₂ K₃ … K_n = ∏_i=1^n K_i
the same relation in logarithms — the form you will actually use
log β_n = log K₁ + log K₂ + … + log K_n = ∑_i=1^n log K_i
stepwise constant from overall constants
K_n = β_n / β_n−1 log K_n = log β_n − log β_n−1 (with β₀ ≡ 1, log β₀ = 0)
free energy from an equilibrium constant
ΔG° = −RT ln K = −2.303 RT log K
the working conversion between log K and ΔG° at 25 °C
ΔG° / kJ mol⁻¹ = −5.708 × log K (at 25 °C)
Davies-type ionic-strength correction, Δ(z²) = ∑z²(products) − ∑z²(reactants)
log K(I) = log K° + A Δ(z²) √I / (1 + √I) + (linear term in I)
fraction of metal present as the n-th complex
α_n = [ML_n] / C_M = β_n[L]^n / (1 + ∑_i=1^N β_i[L]^i)
the side-reaction (alpha) coefficient of a metal ion
α_M(L) = C_M/[M] = 1 + β₁[L] + β₂[L]² + … + β_N[L]^N
the statistical contribution to a stepwise formation constant
K_n(statistical) ∝ (N − n + 1) / n
overall constant for n identical ligands on N equivalent independent sites
β_n = C(N, n) k^n = [N! / (n!(N − n)!)] k^n
residual (non-statistical) fall between consecutive steps
Δlog K_n^(non-stat) = [log K_n − log K_n+1] − log[ ((N−n+1)/n) ÷ ((N−n)/(n+1)) ]
free ligand from pH for a monobasic ligand
[NH₃] = K_a[NH₄⁺] / [H⁺]
the formation function from mass balance
n̄ = (C_N − [NH₃] − [NH₄⁺]) / C_M
Bjerrum’s half-integral method for stepwise constants
log K_n = pL at the point where n̄ = n − ½
stoichiometry from the maximum of a Job plot
x_L(max) = n / (n + 1) ⇔ n = x_L(max) / [1 − x_L(max)]
the theoretical Bjerrum formation function
n̄ = ∑_n=1^N n β_n[L]^n ⁄ (1 + ∑_n=1^N β_n[L]^n)
Bjerrum’s integration method
ln F([L]) = ∫_0^[L] (n̄ / [L]) d[L] ⇒ the β_n are recoverable by integrating the formation curve
protonation side-reaction coefficient of a ligand
α_L(H) = C_L,free/[L] = 1 + β₁^H[H⁺] + β₂^H[H⁺]² + … + β_j^H[H⁺]^j
van’t Hoff relation — ΔH° and ΔS° from log K versus 1/T
d(ln K)/d(1/T) = −ΔH°/R ⇒ log K = −ΔH°/(2.303 R T) + ΔS°/(2.303 R)
the reaction a formation constant really describes
M(H₂O)_n + L ⇌ M(H₂O)_n−1L + H₂O — every formation constant is a substitution constant
the single-number summary of a metal ion’s electrostatic pull
charge/radius ratio (ionic potential) φ = z / r
the contributions behind the Irving–Williams order
−ΔG°_f ≈ (electrostatic term, increasing with z/r) + Δ(LFSE) + (covalent/σ-bonding term) − (desolvation penalty) + (Jahn–Teller term, d⁹ only)
linear free-energy relationship between complex stability and ligand basicity
log K₁ = a · pK_a + b
Hancock’s chelate-ring-size rule
five-membered chelate ring → suits large metal ions; six-membered chelate ring → suits small metal ions
the LFER in free-energy form
ΔG°(metal binding) = a · ΔG°(protonation) + constant
the effective molarity of a chelating ligand’s second donor atom
EM = K_chelate ring closure / K_monodentate analogue ΔG°(chelate advantage) = −RT ln (EM / c°)
why π-acceptors sit off the LFER line
−ΔH(M–L) = E_σ(tracks basicity) + E_π(tracks d-electron count and metal → ligand orbital energy match)
Klopman’s two-term interaction energy: charge control + orbital control
ΔE = −|q_Aq_B| / εR_AB + 2(c_Ac_Bβ)² / (E_HOMO(base) − E_LUMO(acid))
absolute hardness η and absolute electronegativity χ
η = (I − A)/2 χ = (I + A)/2 (I = ionisation energy, A = electron affinity)
the Drago–Wayland equation for adduct formation enthalpy
−ΔH = E_AE_B + C_AC_B
the three-way consistency check on any stability thermodynamics table
ΔG° = ΔH° − TΔS° = −2.303 RT log K ΔΔG° = ΔΔH° − TΔΔS°
the particle-counting origin of the chelate effect
Δn(chelate route) − Δn(monodentate route) = +1 per chelate ring formed ⇒ the effect grows with the number of rings
converting an equilibrium constant between the molar and mole-fraction scales
x_i = c_i / 55.5 (dilute aqueous solution, c in mol dm⁻³) ⇒ K_x = K_c × (55.5)^−Δn
cratic correction to a solution-phase entropy change
ΔS°(observed) = ΔS°(unitary) + Δn · R ln 55.5 R ln 55.5 = 8.314 × 4.016 = 33.4 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹
the preorganisation decomposition of a binding free energy
ΔG°_observed = ΔG_organisation + ΔG_intrinsic binding
the rigidity–selectivity relation
selectivity = K(best guest) / K(competing guest) → increases with host rigidity, even when the absolute K does not
the EDTA formation constant — always 1:1
M^n+ + Y⁴⁻ ⇌ MY^(n−4)+ K_MY = [MY]/([M][Y⁴⁻])
conditional (effective) formation constant, pH correction only
K′_MY = α_Y K_MY log K′_MY = log K_MY + log α_Y
side-reaction coefficient of the metal with an auxiliary ligand
α_M(L) = C_M,free/[M^n+] = 1 + β₁[L] + β₂[L]² + … (≥ 1)
conditional constant corrected for both pH and a competing ligand
K″_MY = α_Y K_MY / α_M(L) log K″ = log K_MY + log α_Y − log α_M(L)
the two conditions on a metallochromic indicator
K′_MY > K′_MIn (usually by a factor of 10⁴ or more) and K′_MIn must still be large enough to colour the solution before the endpoint
the fully corrected conditional constant (Ringbom convention, all α ≥ 1)
K″_MY = K_MY · α_MY / (α_M · α_Y)
minimum pH for a feasible EDTA titration at about 0.01 M
log α_Y(minimum) = 8 − log K_MY ⇒ read the corresponding pH off the α_Y curve

Definitions worth memorising

Stepwise formation constant K_n: the equilibrium constant for adding the nth ligand to the complex that already carries (n − 1) of them. It describes one step only.
Overall (cumulative) formation constant β_n: the equilibrium constant for forming ML_n directly from the free metal ion and n free ligands. Also called the cumulative or gross constant, and sometimes written β_1n.
The three reasons the stepwise constants fall: (1) statistical — fewer vacant sites and more ligands able to leave, worth about 1.6 log units in total for an octahedral centre; (2) electrostatic — the metal’s effective positive charge is progressively neutralised, and ligand–ligand repulsion grows; (3) steric — the coordination sphere becomes crowded.
Bjerrum formation function n̄: the average number of ligand molecules bound per metal ion present, n̄ = (C_L − [L]_not bound to metal) / C_M. It is an experimental quantity — it comes from mass balance and a measured pH, with no assumption about how many complexes exist.
Irving–Williams series: for high-spin octahedral complexes of the first-row divalent metal ions, stability constants increase in the order Mn < Fe < Co < Ni < Cu > Zn, irrespective of the ligand. The maximum at copper and the drop at zinc are as much a part of the series as the rising limb.
Linear free-energy relationship (LFER): a linear correlation between the free energies (equivalently, the logarithms of the equilibrium or rate constants) of two related reaction series. Here, between binding a metal and binding a proton.
Bite angle: the L–M–L angle subtended at the metal by the two donor atoms of a chelating ligand. It is fixed, within a narrow range, by the ligand’s backbone — which is why ring size dictates which metal ions a chelate suits.
Effective molarity (EM): the concentration at which an intermolecular reaction would proceed at the same rate, or lie at the same position of equilibrium, as the corresponding intramolecular one. For chelate ring closure, EM = K(chelate step) / K(analogous intermolecular step), and it has units of concentration.
Hard species are small, of high charge density, and weakly polarisable; their frontier orbitals lie far apart in energy. Soft species are large, of low charge density, and highly polarisable; their frontier orbitals lie close together. The HSAB principle: hard acids prefer hard bases; soft acids prefer soft bases.
Cratic entropy: the part of a solute’s entropy that arises purely from mixing — from the number of ways of distributing solute particles among solvent sites. It depends only on the concentration scale, not on the identity of the solute. Unitary entropy: everything else — the part that reflects the actual structure, vibrations and solvation of the species.
Macrocyclic effect: the additional thermodynamic stability of the complex of a cyclic polydentate ligand over that of its open-chain analogue with the same donor atoms, the same number of donors and the same chelate ring sizes.
Preorganisation: the extent to which a ligand (host) is already in the conformation required for binding, and already stripped of solvent, before it meets the metal (guest). The more preorganised the host, the less free energy must be spent organising it during binding, and the more stable the complex.
Cryptate effect: the further enhancement of stability, and of selectivity, obtained on going from a two-dimensional macrocycle (a crown) to a three-dimensional bicyclic cage (a cryptand) with the same donor set. Typically worth a further three to four orders of magnitude in water.
α_Y: the fraction of the total dissolved EDTA present as the fully deprotonated Y⁴⁻. α_Y = [Y⁴⁻]/C_EDTA. It is a pure number between 0 and 1, it depends only on pH, and it is tabulated.
Conditional (effective) formation constant K′: the formation constant written in terms of the total concentration of each free reagent rather than the concentration of the single reactive species. It is constant at fixed pH and fixed concentrations of any competing ligands, and it is the number that governs the actual titration.
Masking: adding a reagent that binds an interfering ion so strongly that it no longer reacts with the titrant, without removing it from solution. Demasking reverses the process, releasing the ion for a second titration.

Where these come from

This sheet is distilled from Coordination Chemistry, Part 7 — 9 sections that derive every one of these results and show you how to use them.

Read Part 7 All formula sheets