Deep-Dive Guides · Chemical Thermodynamics

Classical Thermodynamics — the complete deep dive

From the three laws to Maxwell relations, spontaneity criteria, the ΔG–K link and its temperature dependence. The organising idea: thermodynamics is bookkeeping of state functions.

Free guide — the complete guide, open to everyone.

0. How to use this guide — the state-function map

Everything below hangs on one distinction and one decision.

The distinction: a state function (U, H, S, A, G, T, P, V) depends only on the current state, so its change around any cycle is zero and its differential is exact. Path functions (q, w) depend on how you got there — there is no "heat content" of a state. Reversible paths are the extremal paths: maximum work is delivered, and along them dS = dqrev/T holds as an equality.
The decision — which potential? Nature minimises the potential whose natural variables are the ones held constant. Choose by your constraints: constant S,V → U; constant S,P → H; constant T,V → A (Helmholtz); constant T,P → G (Gibbs). Because most chemistry happens at constant T and P, G is the working currency of chemistry: ΔG<0 ⇒ spontaneous.
ConstraintPotential minimisedFundamental relationSpontaneity test
isolated (U,V const)——dS ≥ 0 (2nd law, universe)
S, V constInternal energy UdU = T dS − P dVdU ≤ 0
S, P constEnthalpy H = U+PVdH = T dS + V dPdH ≤ 0
T, V constHelmholtz A = U−TSdA = −S dT − P dVdA ≤ 0
T, P constGibbs G = H−TSdG = −S dT + V dPdG ≤ 0
The three questions to ask of any thermodynamics problem: (1) What is held constant? (picks the potential and which of q/w survives). (2) Is the path reversible or irreversible? (picks whether dS = dq/T or >). (3) System or surroundings or universe? (spontaneity is a statement about the universe, ΔSuniv ≥ 0, but is repackaged as ΔGsys ≤ 0 only at constant T,P). Answer these three and the algebra follows.

1. Zeroth & First Law — energy, work, enthalpy ▲ top

Zeroth law: if A is in thermal equilibrium with C and B is in thermal equilibrium with C, then A and B are in equilibrium with each other. This transitivity is what makes temperature a well-defined state function and lets a thermometer work.

1.1 State versus path functions

For a state function f(x,y), the differential is exact: df = (∂f/∂x)ydx + (∂f/∂y)xdy and the cross-derivatives are equal (Euler / reciprocity). This equality is the seed of every Maxwell relation (§3). For a path function such as work, ∮dw ≠ 0 in general, and you must specify the path to integrate it.

Sign convention (IUPAC / "acquisitive"): this guide uses ΔU = q + w, where w = −∫PextdV is work done on the system. Work done on the system (compression) is positive. Heat absorbed by the system is positive. (Some Indian textbooks write ΔU = q − w with w = work done by the gas; the physics is identical — just track the sign of w.)

1.2 Work, heat and reversibility

For expansion/compression, w = −∫V1V2 Pext dV. The external pressure — not the gas pressure — does the accounting.

  • Free (Joule) expansion into vacuum: Pext = 0 ⇒ w = 0. For an ideal gas ΔU = 0 (U depends only on T), so q = 0 too — yet ΔS > 0 (irreversible).
  • Irreversible against constant Pext: w = −Pext(V2−V1).
  • Reversible isothermal (ideal gas): Pext = P = nRT/V at every instant, so wrev = −nRT ln(V2/V1). This is the maximum magnitude of work — reversible work is the envelope of all paths.
Volume V →Pressure P →1 (V₁,P₁)2 (V₂,P₂)reversible isothermirreversible (against P₂)|wrev| = area under curve (largest)
Fig T-1. Isothermal expansion 1→2. The magnitude of work equals the area under the P–V path. The smooth reversible isotherm (violet) encloses the greatest area, so |wrev| > |wirr|: reversible expansion delivers the maximum work. Run in reverse, reversible compression costs the least work.

1.3 First law and the definition of enthalpy

dU = δq + δw = δq − Pext dV first law

At constant volume, δw = 0, so qV = ΔU: the heat measured in a bomb calorimeter is ΔU directly. Most reactions run at constant pressure, where the system also does expansion work; to make heat a state-function-like quantity we define enthalpy.

Deriving qP = ΔH
  1. At constant P: qP = ΔU − w = ΔU + P ΔV = (U2−U1) + P(V2−V1).
  2. Group by state: qP = (U2+PV2) − (U1+PV1).
  3. Define H ≡ U + PV (a state function, since U, P, V all are). Then qP = H2 − H1 = ΔH. ∎

Relation for reactions: ΔH = ΔU + Δ(PV); for ideal gases at constant T, ΔH = ΔU + ΔngasRT, where Δngas = (moles gaseous products − reactants).

1.4 Heat capacities and the Cp − Cv relation

CV = (∂U/∂T)V and CP = (∂H/∂T)P. CP exceeds CV because at constant P part of the added heat does expansion work rather than raising T.

General CP − CV (any substance), then ideal-gas limit
  1. Start from H = U + PV and differentiate at constant P: CP = (∂U/∂T)P + P(∂V/∂T)P.
  2. Expand (∂U/∂T)P using U(T,V): (∂U/∂T)P = CV + (∂U/∂V)T(∂V/∂T)P.
  3. Combine: CP − CV = [P + (∂U/∂V)T](∂V/∂T)P. The bracket is the "internal pressure + external pressure".
  4. Using the thermodynamic equation of state (∂U/∂V)T = T(∂P/∂T)V − P (derived in §3), this becomes the exact result CP − CV = T V α²/κT, with α = isobaric expansivity, κT = isothermal compressibility. This is always ≥ 0.
  5. Ideal gas: (∂U/∂V)T = 0 and (∂V/∂T)P = nR/P, so CP − CV = nR (Mayer's relation). Per mole, CP,m − CV,m = R.
Ideal gasCV,mCP,mγ = CP/CV
Monatomic (He, Ar)(3/2)R ≈ 12.47(5/2)R ≈ 20.795/3 ≈ 1.67
Diatomic (N₂, O₂), 298 K(5/2)R ≈ 20.79(7/2)R ≈ 29.107/5 = 1.40
Nonlinear polyatomic (translation+rotation)3R ≈ 24.944R ≈ 33.264/3 ≈ 1.33
Equipartition gives each quadratic degree of freedom (½)R to CV,m: 3 translational for any gas; +2 rotational (linear) or +3 (nonlinear); vibrational modes add R each but only "switch on" at high T (see the Statistical Thermodynamics guide for why).

1.5 Adiabatic reversible processes

Deriving PVγ = const for a reversible adiabat (ideal gas)
  1. Adiabatic: δq = 0 ⇒ dU = δw ⇒ CVdT = −P dV = −(nRT/V)dV.
  2. Separate: CV dT/T = −nR dV/V. Integrate: CV ln(T₂/T₁) = −nR ln(V₂/V₁).
  3. Use nR = CP−CV and divide by CV: ln(T₂/T₁) = −(γ−1) ln(V₂/V₁), i.e. T Vγ−1 = const.
  4. Substitute T ∝ PV: P Vγ = const, and Tγ P1−γ = const. Work: w = CVΔT = (P₂V₂−P₁V₁)/(γ−1).
Adiabat is steeper than isotherm. On a P–V plot |dP/dV|adiabat = γ|dP/dV|isotherm: an adiabatic expansion cools the gas, so pressure falls faster than along an isotherm.

1.6 Thermochemistry & Kirchhoff's law

Hess's law is just "ΔH is a state function": the enthalpy of a reaction is the sum over any convenient path. ΔH°rxn = Σν ΔH°f(products) − Σν ΔH°f(reactants) (elements in standard states have ΔH°f = 0). The temperature dependence is Kirchhoff's law:

(∂ΔHrxn/∂T)P = ΔCP ⇒ ΔH(T₂) = ΔH(T₁) + ∫T₁T₂ ΔCP dT Kirchhoff

with ΔCP = Σν CP(products) − Σν CP(reactants). An identical relation holds for ΔS with ΔCP/T inside the integral.

Solved example — ΔH vs ΔU for a combustion

Q: For C₃H₈(g) + 5O₂(g) → 3CO₂(g) + 4H₂O(l), ΔU° = −2212.5 kJ/mol at 298 K. Find ΔH°.

Count gas moles: products gaseous = 3 (CO₂; water is liquid); reactants gaseous = 1 + 5 = 6. Δngas = 3 − 6 = −3.

Apply ΔH = ΔU + ΔngasRT = −2212.5 + (−3)(8.314×10⁻³)(298) = −2212.5 − 7.43 = −2219.9 kJ/mol.

Because gas moles decrease, the system is compressed by the surroundings (work done on it), so |ΔH| > |ΔU| here.

2. Second & Third Law — entropy & spontaneity ▲ top

The first law conserves energy but says nothing about direction. Ice melting and water freezing both conserve energy; only one is spontaneous at 25 °C. The second law supplies the arrow of time through entropy.

Three equivalent statements.Kelvin–Planck: no cyclic process can convert heat entirely into work (no perfect heat engine). Clausius: heat cannot flow spontaneously from cold to hot (no perfect refrigerator). Entropy: there exists a state function S with dS ≥ δq/T (equality for reversible paths); for an isolated system ΔS ≥ 0.

2.1 The Carnot cycle and the working-substance independence of efficiency

Carnot's engine (two isotherms + two adiabats, all reversible) is the theoretical maximum. It fixes the thermodynamic temperature scale and forces the existence of entropy.

Volume V →Pressure P →ABCDA→B: isothermal T_h (q_h in)B→C adiabatC→D: isothermal T_c (q_c out)D→A adiabatη = 1 − T_c/T_h= 1 − |q_c|/q_h
Fig T-2. The Carnot cycle: reversible isotherms (violet) at Th and Tc joined by reversible adiabats (red). Enclosed area = net work. Because qh/Th + qc/Tc = 0 around the cycle, ∮dqrev/T = 0 — proving dqrev/T is an exact differential, i.e. entropy is a state function.
Carnot efficiency and the birth of entropy
  1. Along the two isotherms (ideal gas, ΔU=0): qh = nRThln(VB/VA) > 0; qc = nRTcln(VD/VC) < 0.
  2. The two adiabats give ThVBγ−1=TcVCγ−1 and ThVAγ−1=TcVDγ−1, so VB/VA = VC/VD.
  3. Hence qc/qh = −Tc/Th, giving η = 1 + qc/qh = 1 − Tc/Th — independent of the working substance.
  4. Rearranged: qh/Th + qc/Tc = 0. Summing over a reversible cycle built from Carnot strips, ∮ δqrev/T = 0 ⇒ dS = δqrev/T defines a state function S. For any irreversible engine η < ηCarnot, giving the Clausius inequality ∮δq/T ≤ 0. ∎

2.2 Computing entropy changes

Because S is a state function, always integrate along a convenient reversible path between the same endpoints.

Process (ideal gas unless noted)ΔS
Isothermal reversible volume changenR ln(V₂/V₁) = −nR ln(P₂/P₁)
Isochoric heatingnCV,m ln(T₂/T₁)
Isobaric heatingnCP,m ln(T₂/T₁)
General (T and V both change)nCV,mln(T₂/T₁) + nR ln(V₂/V₁)
Phase change at TtrsΔHtrs/Ttrs
Mixing of ideal gases (const T,P)−nR Σ xi ln xi > 0

Solved example — entropy of the universe for irreversible expansion

Q: 2.0 mol ideal gas at 300 K expands isothermally and irreversibly from 10.0 L to 20.0 L against a constant external pressure equal to the final pressure. Find ΔSsys, ΔSsurr, ΔSuniv.

ΔSsys (state function, use reversible path) = nR ln(V₂/V₁) = 2.0×8.314×ln2 = 2.0×8.314×0.6931 = +11.53 J/K.

Heat to surroundings: ΔU=0 ⇒ q = −w. Pext = P₂ = nRT/V₂ = (2×8.314×300)/(20×10⁻³) = 2.494×10⁵ Pa. w = −PextΔV = −(2.494×10⁵)(10×10⁻³) = −2494 J. So qsys = +2494 J; qsurr = −2494 J.

ΔSsurr = qsurr/T = −2494/300 = −8.31 J/K. ΔSuniv = 11.53 − 8.31 = +3.22 J/K > 0 ✓ (irreversible). For a reversible expansion qsys would be nRT ln2 = 3458 J, ΔSsurr = −11.53 J/K and ΔSuniv = 0.

2.3 The Third Law and absolute entropies

Third law (Nernst–Planck): the entropy of a perfect crystalline substance approaches zero as T → 0 K. Consequence: entropies are absolute (unlike U or H, which are only ever known as differences). S°(T) = ∫₀T(CP/T)dT + Σ(ΔHtrs/Ttrs), summed over any phase transitions on the way up.
  • Residual entropy S(0) > 0 occurs for frozen-in disorder: CO (head-tail), ice (H-bond proton disorder, R ln(3/2) ≈ 3.4 J/K/mol), FClO₃. These deviate because the crystal is not "perfect".
  • Unattainability of absolute zero in a finite number of steps is an equivalent statement of the third law.
Which residual-entropy value should you quote for ice? Pauling’s R ln(3/2) — it is the one you can derive, and it matches experiment. Pauling counted the proton arrangements allowed by the ice rules on each oxygen and obtained S(0) = R ln(3/2) = 8.314 × 0.4055 = 3.37 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹. Low-temperature calorimetry gives about 3.4 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹, so the model sits within a couple of per cent of the measured value; the small shortfall is the long-range correlation between neighbouring arrangements that the simple counting ignores. So the two numbers are not competing answers — quote R ln(3/2) ≈ 3.37 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ and say that it reproduces the experimental ~3.4. The same Boltzmann argument, S(0) = kB ln W with W = wN, gives R ln 2 ≈ 5.76 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ for CO, whose two head–tail orientations are nearly indistinguishable to the lattice.

3. Thermodynamic potentials & Maxwell relations ▲ top

Combining the first and second laws for a reversible process (δqrev=TdS, δw=−PdV) gives the fundamental equation, the single most useful line in the subject:

dU = T dS − P dV master relation

Everything else is a Legendre transform of this. Add or subtract PV and TS to slide between potentials so that the natural variables match your experiment:

The four potentials and their differentials
  1. U(S,V): dU = T dS − P dV.
  2. H = U + PV: dH = dU + P dV + V dP = T dS + V dP → natural variables (S,P).
  3. A = U − TS (Helmholtz): dA = dU − T dS − S dT = −S dT − P dV → (T,V).
  4. G = H − TS (Gibbs): dG = dH − T dS − S dT = −S dT + V dP → (T,P).

Read coefficients directly: e.g. from dG, (∂G/∂T)P = −S and (∂G/∂P)T = V. Since S > 0, G always decreases as T rises; since V > 0, G increases with P (steeper for gases).

3.1 The four Maxwell relations

Each potential's differential is exact, so its mixed second derivatives are equal. Applying (∂²/∂x∂y) to each fundamental equation gives:

FromMaxwell relation
dU = T dS − P dV(∂T/∂V)S = −(∂P/∂S)V
dH = T dS + V dP(∂T/∂P)S = (∂V/∂S)P
dA = −S dT − P dV(∂S/∂V)T = (∂P/∂T)V
dG = −S dT + V dP(∂S/∂P)T = −(∂V/∂T)P
Why they matter: the last two convert an unmeasurable entropy derivative into a measurable equation-of-state derivative. That is exactly how we prove (∂U/∂V)T = T(∂P/∂T)V − P (the "thermodynamic equation of state"), and thence that (∂U/∂V)T = 0 for an ideal gas.
Worked derivation — internal pressure of a gas
  1. Want (∂U/∂V)T. From dU = TdS − PdV at constant T: (∂U/∂V)T = T(∂S/∂V)T − P.
  2. Apply the Helmholtz Maxwell relation (∂S/∂V)T = (∂P/∂T)V: (∂U/∂V)T = T(∂P/∂T)V − P.
  3. Ideal gas: P = nRT/V ⇒ (∂P/∂T)V = nR/V ⇒ T(nR/V) − P = P − P = 0. So U(ideal) depends on T only. ✓
  4. van der Waals: (∂P/∂T)V = nR/(V−nb) gives (∂U/∂V)T = a n²/V² > 0 — the internal pressure from attractions, which is why real gases cool on Joule–Thomson expansion.

3.2 Gibbs–Helmholtz & the pressure dependence of G

Gibbs–Helmholtz equation
  1. Consider ∂(G/T)/∂T at constant P. Quotient rule: (1/T)(∂G/∂T)P − G/T².
  2. Insert (∂G/∂T)P = −S and G = H − TS: = (1/T)(−S) − (H−TS)/T² = −S/T − H/T² + S/T = −H/T².
  3. So [∂(G/T)/∂T]P = −H/T², and for a reaction [∂(ΔG/T)/∂T]P = −ΔH/T² — the route to the van't Hoff equation (§4).

Pressure dependence: from (∂G/∂P)T = V, integrating for an ideal gas gives G(P) = G° + nRT ln(P/P°). For a condensed phase V is nearly constant, so ΔG ≈ VΔP is small. This log term is the origin of the chemical potential of a gas and of the reaction quotient.

4. Chemical potential, ΔG–K & temperature dependence ▲ top

For a mixture that can change composition, add composition terms to dG: dG = −S dT + V dP + Σ μi dni, where μi = (∂G/∂ni)T,P,nj is the chemical potential (partial molar Gibbs energy). Matter flows from high μ to low μ, exactly as heat flows from high T to low T.

μi = μi° + RT ln aiactivity form

where activity ai = Pi/P° (ideal gas), = γixi (real solution — here γi is the activity coefficient, not the heat-capacity ratio γ = CP/CV of §1.5), = 1 (pure solid/liquid). Summing νμ over a reaction defines the reaction Gibbs energy ΔGrxn = (∂G/∂ξ)T,P, the slope of G against extent of reaction ξ.

Deriving ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q and ΔG° = −RT ln K
  1. ΔGrxn = Σνiμi = Σνi(μi° + RT ln ai) = ΔG° + RT ln Q, where Q = Π aiνi (products over reactants).
  2. At equilibrium the slope of G vs ξ is zero: ΔGrxn = 0 and Q = K (the equilibrium constant). So 0 = ΔG° + RT ln K ⇒ ΔG° = −RT ln K.
  3. Substituting back: ΔG = RT ln(Q/K). Sign test: Q<K ⇒ ΔG<0, reaction runs forward; Q>K ⇒ ΔG>0, runs backward; Q=K ⇒ at rest.
extent of reaction ξ (0 = pure reactants, 1 = pure products)Gibbs energy Gslope = ΔG_rxn = 0 → equilibrium (Q = K)ΔG < 0 (forward, Q<K)ΔG > 0 (reverse, Q>K)ξ_eq
Fig T-3. G against extent of reaction ξ. The system always slides downhill in G; equilibrium is the minimum, where the slope ΔGrxn = (∂G/∂ξ) = 0. The depth and position of the minimum are set by ΔG° = −RT ln K. Note the minimum lies between pure reactants and products — mixing entropy guarantees some of both.

4.1 Temperature dependence — the van't Hoff equation

From Gibbs–Helmholtz to van't Hoff
  1. ln K = −ΔG°/RT. Differentiate w.r.t. T: d(ln K)/dT = −(1/R) d(ΔG°/T)/dT.
  2. By Gibbs–Helmholtz, d(ΔG°/T)/dT = −ΔH°/T². Hence d(ln K)/dT = ΔH°/RT² (differential van't Hoff).
  3. Assuming ΔH° roughly constant over the range, integrate: ln(K₂/K₁) = −(ΔH°/R)(1/T₂ − 1/T₁). A plot of ln K vs 1/T is linear with slope −ΔH°/R and intercept ΔS°/R.
1 / T (K⁻¹)ln Kexothermic (ΔH°<0): slope +, K falls as T risesendothermic (ΔH°>0): slope −, K rises as T risesslope = −ΔH°/R
Fig T-4. van't Hoff plot. Slope = −ΔH°/R. Exothermic reactions (ΔH°<0) have a positive slope, so ln K decreases as T rises (1/T falls) — heating shifts equilibrium back, consistent with Le Chatelier. Endothermic reactions show the opposite. The intercept at 1/T→0 gives ΔS°/R.

4.2 Clausius–Clapeyron & phase boundaries

Clapeyron → Clausius–Clapeyron
  1. Along a two-phase coexistence line the molar Gibbs energies are equal: μα=μβ. Moving along the line, dμα=dμβ ⇒ −SαdT+VαdP = −SβdT+VβdP.
  2. Rearrange to the exact Clapeyron equation: dP/dT = ΔStrs/ΔVtrs = ΔHtrs/(T ΔVtrs).
  3. For vaporisation/sublimation, ΔV ≈ Vgas = RT/P and assume ideal: dP/dT = ΔHvapP/(RT²) ⇒ d ln P/dT = ΔHvap/RT², i.e. ln(P₂/P₁) = −(ΔHvap/R)(1/T₂ − 1/T₁).
Water's negative solid–liquid slope: ice is less dense than water, so ΔVfus < 0, and by Clapeyron dP/dT < 0 — the melting line tilts left. Increased pressure lowers water's melting point (the classic exception).

Solved example — vapour pressure via Clausius–Clapeyron

Q: Water boils (P = 1.00 atm) at 373 K with ΔHvap = 40.7 kJ/mol. Estimate its vapour pressure at 350 K.

ln(P₂/1.00) = −(40700/8.314)(1/350 − 1/373) = −4895.4 × (0.0028571 − 0.0026810) = −4895.4 × 1.7617×10⁻⁴ = −0.8624.

P₂ = e−0.8624 = 0.422 atm (≈ 321 mmHg). Reasonable — real value near 0.41 atm; the small gap is from assuming constant ΔHvap.

4.3 ΔG°, K, and electrochemistry — one unifying triangle

BridgeRelationUse
Thermodynamics ↔ equilibriumΔG° = −RT ln Kget K from tabulated ΔG°f
Thermodynamics ↔ cell EMFΔG° = −nFE°cellspontaneity of redox; E°>0 ⇒ ΔG°<0
Equilibrium ↔ EMFE° = (RT/nF) ln K; Nernst: E = E° − (RT/nF)ln Qconcentration cells, pH, Ksp
ΔG splitΔG° = ΔH° − TΔS°sign analysis / crossover temperature T = ΔH°/ΔS°

Solved example — K from ΔG°, and its temperature shift

Q: A reaction has ΔH° = +52.0 kJ/mol and ΔS° = +120 J/K/mol. (a) Find ΔG° and K at 298 K. (b) Above what T does it become spontaneous? (c) Find K at 500 K.

(a) ΔG° = 52000 − 298×120 = 52000 − 35760 = +16240 J/mol. ln K = −ΔG°/RT = −16240/(8.314×298) = −6.556 ⇒ K = 1.42×10⁻³.

(b) Spontaneous when ΔG°<0 ⇒ T > ΔH°/ΔS° = 52000/120 = 433 K.

(c) ΔG°(500) = 52000 − 500×120 = −8000 J/mol ⇒ ln K = 8000/(8.314×500) = 1.925 ⇒ K = 6.85. (Cross-check via van't Hoff from 298 K gives the same order, confirming the ΔH°/ΔS° assumption.)

Two routes to K(500 K), and why they have to agree. Part (c) built ΔG°(500) from ΔH° and ΔS° and used ln K = −ΔG°/RT. The van’t Hoff route instead extrapolates the 298 K answer: ln K(500) = ln K(298) − (ΔH°/R)(1/500 − 1/298) = −6.556 − (52000/8.314)(0.002000 − 0.003356) = −6.556 + 8.48 = 1.93, so K ≈ 6.9 — the same answer as the direct route. That agreement is reassuring but it is not an independent test of the physics: both routes assume ΔH° and ΔS° are temperature-independent, and under that assumption they are the same equation rearranged. What it does check is your arithmetic. The practical rule is about which data you are handed: given K at one temperature plus ΔH°, use van’t Hoff; given ΔH° and ΔS°, build ΔG°(T) and use ln K = −ΔG°/RT. Both are safe over a couple of hundred kelvin; across a phase change, or where ΔCP is large, neither is, and you must put the temperature dependence of ΔH° back in through Kirchhoff’s law.

5. Worked problems — graded easy → hard ▲ top

Constants used throughout: R = 8.314 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ = 0.08206 L atm K⁻¹ mol⁻¹; F = 96485 C mol⁻¹. Click "Show solution".

Easy

P1. Isothermal reversible expansion.

2.00 mol ideal gas expands reversibly and isothermally at 300 K from 10.0 L to 20.0 L. Find w, q, ΔU, ΔH, ΔSsys.

Show solution

Isothermal ideal gas ⇒ ΔU = 0 and ΔH = 0. w = −nRT ln(V₂/V₁) = −2.00×8.314×300×ln2 = −2.00×8.314×300×0.6931 = −3458 J. q = −w = +3458 J. ΔSsys = nR ln(V₂/V₁) = 2.00×8.314×0.6931 = +11.53 J/K. (Reversible ⇒ ΔSuniv=0.)

Easy

P2. Choose the potential.

A reaction is run in an open flask (constant T and P). Which thermodynamic potential's minimisation determines equilibrium, and what is the spontaneity criterion?

Show solution

Constant T,P ⇒ natural variables of Gibbs energy G. Equilibrium is the minimum of G; a change is spontaneous iff ΔG < 0 (equivalently ΔSuniv > 0). At constant T,V you would instead minimise Helmholtz A.

Easy

P3. ΔH − ΔU for ammonia synthesis.

N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) → 2NH₃(g). By how much do ΔH and ΔU differ at 298 K?

Show solution

Δngas = 2 − (1+3) = −2. ΔH − ΔU = ΔngasRT = (−2)(8.314)(298) = −4955 J ≈ −4.96 kJ. So ΔH is about 5 kJ more negative than ΔU (gas moles fall, surroundings do work on the system).

Easy

P4. Carnot efficiency.

A reversible heat engine works between 500 K and 300 K. Maximum efficiency? If it absorbs 1000 J from the hot reservoir, how much work and how much waste heat?

Show solution

η = 1 − Tc/Th = 1 − 300/500 = 0.40 (40%). Work = 0.40×1000 = 400 J; heat rejected |qc| = 1000 − 400 = 600 J (check: qc/qh = −Tc/Th = −0.6 ✓).

Medium

P5. Reversible adiabatic compression.

1.00 mol monatomic ideal gas (γ = 5/3) at 300 K is compressed reversibly and adiabatically to half its volume. Find the final temperature and the work done.

Show solution

Adiabat: T Vγ−1 = const ⇒ T₂ = T₁(V₁/V₂)γ−1 = 300×(2)2/3 = 300×1.5874 = 476.2 K. Since q = 0, w = ΔU = nCV,mΔT = 1.00×(3/2×8.314)×(476.2−300) = 12.471×176.2 = +2198 J (positive: work done on the gas). Temperature rises on compression.

Medium

P6. Entropy of mixing.

0.50 mol N₂ and 0.50 mol O₂, each at 1 bar and 298 K, are mixed at constant T and P to 1 bar total. Find ΔSmix and ΔGmix.

Show solution

Mole fractions x = 0.5 each; ntotal = 1.0. ΔSmix = −nR Σxiln xi = −(1.0)(8.314)(0.5 ln0.5 + 0.5 ln0.5) = −8.314×ln0.5 = +5.76 J/K. ΔHmix = 0 (ideal), so ΔGmix = −TΔSmix = −298×5.76 = −1717 J (spontaneous, entropy-driven).

Medium

P7. van't Hoff — ΔH° from K(T).

An equilibrium constant doubles when T rises from 300 K to 310 K. Estimate ΔH°.

Show solution

ln(K₂/K₁) = −(ΔH°/R)(1/T₂ − 1/T₁). ln2 = 0.6931 = −(ΔH°/8.314)(1/310 − 1/300) = −(ΔH°/8.314)(−1.0753×10⁻⁴). Solve: ΔH° = 0.6931×8.314/1.0753×10⁻⁴ = +53.6 kJ/mol (endothermic — K rises with T ✓).

Medium

P8. Clausius–Clapeyron — ΔHvap from two vapour pressures.

A liquid has vapour pressure 100 mmHg at 300 K and 400 mmHg at 340 K. Find ΔHvap.

Show solution

ln(P₂/P₁) = −(ΔHvap/R)(1/T₂ − 1/T₁). ln(400/100) = ln4 = 1.3863 = −(ΔHvap/8.314)(1/340 − 1/300) = −(ΔHvap/8.314)(−3.9216×10⁻⁴). ΔHvap = 1.3863×8.314/3.9216×10⁻⁴ = +29.4 kJ/mol.

Hard

P9. Electrochemistry ↔ thermodynamics ↔ K.

The Daniell cell (Zn|Zn²⁺||Cu²⁺|Cu) has E° = 1.10 V, n = 2 at 298 K. Find ΔG° and the equilibrium constant K.

Show solution

ΔG° = −nFE° = −2×96485×1.10 = −212.3 kJ/mol (strongly spontaneous). ln K = nFE°/RT = 212267/(8.314×298) = 85.67 ⇒ K = e85.67 ≈ 1.6×10³⁷. The huge K means the reaction goes essentially to completion — consistent with a large positive cell potential.

Hard

P10. Kirchhoff's law — ΔH at a new temperature.

For N₂ + 3H₂ → 2NH₃, ΔH°(298 K) = −92.2 kJ. Using CP,m (J K⁻¹mol⁻¹): NH₃ 35.1, N₂ 29.1, H₂ 28.8, estimate ΔH° at 398 K.

Show solution

ΔCP = 2(35.1) − [29.1 + 3(28.8)] = 70.2 − 115.5 = −45.3 J/K. Assuming ΔCP constant: ΔH°(398) = ΔH°(298) + ΔCPΔT = −92200 + (−45.3)(100) = −92200 − 4530 = −96.7 kJ. The reaction becomes slightly more exothermic on heating because the products have lower total heat capacity.

Note on the data: the CP values are standard 298 K figures treated as constants. Real heat capacities drift with temperature, but over a 100 K interval that drift moves ΔH° by well under 1 kJ, so the constant-ΔCP form of Kirchhoff’s law is the right tool here.

6. CSIR Part-C style problems ▲ top

Part-C rewards sign reasoning, derivations, and joining sub-topics. Each mirrors a typical stem.

Part-C

C1. Four-quadrant spontaneity.

Classify the temperature dependence of spontaneity for each sign combination of (ΔH°, ΔS°), and give the crossover temperature where relevant.

Show solution

ΔG° = ΔH° − TΔS°.
(−, +): ΔG° < 0 at all T — always spontaneous (e.g. 2H₂O₂→2H₂O+O₂).
(+, −): ΔG° > 0 at all T — never spontaneous.
(−, −): spontaneous only below T = ΔH°/ΔS° (enthalpy-driven; e.g. condensation, most exothermic associations).
(+, +): spontaneous only above T = ΔH°/ΔS° (entropy-driven; e.g. vaporisation, CaCO₃ decomposition). The crossover T = ΔH°/ΔS° is where ΔG° = 0 and K = 1.

Part-C

C2. Derive (∂CV/∂V)T.

Show that (∂CV/∂V)T = T(∂²P/∂T²)V, and hence that CV of an ideal gas is volume-independent.

Show solution

CV = (∂U/∂T)V. Then (∂CV/∂V)T = ∂/∂V(∂U/∂T)V = ∂/∂T(∂U/∂V)T (equality of mixed partials). Insert the thermodynamic equation of state (∂U/∂V)T = T(∂P/∂T)V − P: ∂/∂T[T(∂P/∂T)V − P]V = (∂P/∂T)V + T(∂²P/∂T²)V − (∂P/∂T)V = T(∂²P/∂T²)V. For an ideal gas P = nRT/V is linear in T, so (∂²P/∂T²)V = 0 ⇒ CV is independent of V. ∎

Part-C

C3. Joule–Thomson coefficient.

Derive μJT = (∂T/∂P)H in terms of measurable quantities, show it is zero for an ideal gas, and explain the inversion temperature.

Show solution

Using the triple product rule on H(T,P): μJT = (∂T/∂P)H = −(∂H/∂P)T/(∂H/∂T)P = −(1/CP)(∂H/∂P)T. Now (∂H/∂P)T = V − T(∂V/∂T)P (from dH = TdS + VdP and a Maxwell relation). Hence μJT = (1/CP)[T(∂V/∂T)P − V]. Ideal gas: (∂V/∂T)P = V/T ⇒ bracket = 0 ⇒ μJT = 0 (no temperature change on throttling). Real gas: below the inversion temperature μJT > 0 (attractions dominate → gas cools on expansion, basis of Linde liquefaction); above it μJT < 0 (repulsions dominate → gas warms). H₂ and He have very low inversion temperatures, so they warm on ordinary throttling.

Part-C

C4. Entropy generated by heat flow.

Two large reservoirs at 400 K and 300 K are connected by a conducting bar; 1000 J flows from hot to cold. Compute ΔSuniv and comment.

Show solution

Reservoirs are large ⇒ each stays at its T. ΔShot = −1000/400 = −2.50 J/K; ΔScold = +1000/300 = +3.33 J/K. ΔSuniv = +0.83 J/K > 0 — spontaneous, as required for heat flowing hot→cold. Reverse flow would give ΔSuniv < 0 (forbidden — the Clausius statement). The lost work (exergy destroyed) = T0ΔSuniv.

Part-C

C5. Coupled equilibria (thermodynamic coupling).

Reaction A has ΔG° = +30 kJ (non-spontaneous). It is coupled to ATP hydrolysis with ΔG° = −31 kJ. Is the coupled process spontaneous, and what is the overall K at 298 K?

Show solution

Gibbs energies of coupled reactions add: ΔG°total = +30 + (−31) = −1 kJ ⇒ spontaneous (just barely). K = exp(−ΔG°/RT) = exp(1000/(8.314×298)) = exp(0.4037) = 1.50. This is the thermodynamic basis of biochemical coupling: an exergonic driver pulls an endergonic reaction forward by sharing a common intermediate.

Part-C

C6. Maxwell relation to a measurement.

Using a Maxwell relation, find how the entropy of an ideal gas changes with pressure at constant T, and evaluate ΔS when 1 mol is compressed isothermally from 1 bar to 10 bar.

Show solution

From dG: (∂S/∂P)T = −(∂V/∂T)P. Ideal gas (∂V/∂T)P = nR/P, so (∂S/∂P)T = −nR/P. Integrate: ΔS = −nR ln(P₂/P₁) = −1×8.314×ln10 = −8.314×2.3026 = −19.14 J/K. Entropy falls on compression (fewer accessible positions), consistent with ΔS = nR ln(V₂/V₁) since V₂/V₁ = P₁/P₂.

7. Traps & look-alikes ▲ top

⚠ The classic confusions — memorise the discriminators

  • Spontaneous ≠ fast. Thermodynamics (ΔG) predicts direction and extent, not rate. Diamond→graphite has ΔG<0 but is infinitely slow (kinetics).
  • ΔSsys can be negative for a spontaneous process — freezing, protein folding. The test is always ΔSuniv ≥ 0 (or ΔGsys ≤ 0 at const T,P), never ΔSsys alone.
  • q and w are path functions; ΔU, ΔH, ΔS, ΔG are state functions. "Heat of a state" and "work content" do not exist.
  • Reversible ≠ ΔS = 0. Reversible means ΔSuniv = 0; ΔSsys can be large (e.g. reversible isothermal expansion).
  • ΔG° vs ΔG. ΔG° = −RT ln K is a constant at fixed T (standard states); ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q is the actual driving force at the current Q. At equilibrium ΔG = 0 but ΔG° ≠ 0.
  • ΔG° = 0 means K = 1, not "no reaction." Reaction proceeds to a 50:50-ish mixture.
  • Le Chatelier for T uses ΔH. Heating shifts endothermic direction; adding a catalyst shifts nothing (changes rate, not K).
  • Clapeyron (exact, any transition) vs Clausius–Clapeyron (approximation for vapour, assumes ideal gas and Vgas≫Vcond). Don't use C–C for solid↔liquid.
  • CP,m − CV,m = R only for an ideal gas. (The extensive form is CP − CV = nR.) General result is TVα²/κT; for liquids/solids the difference is small but nonzero.
  • Third law gives absolute S, not S = 0 for everything. Only a perfect crystal at 0 K has S = 0; residual entropy (CO, ice) is a genuine exception.
  • Internal energy of ideal gas depends only on T — a consequence of (∂U/∂V)T = 0, not an axiom. It fails for real gases (a n²/V²).
  • Maxwell relations: watch the sign. Only the U- and G-relations carry a minus sign on one side; deriving from the correct fundamental equation prevents errors.

8. Quick-recall master tables ▲ top

8.1 Fundamental equations & potentials

PotentialDefinitionDifferentialCoefficients (from dΦ)
U(S,V)—dU = TdS − PdV(∂U/∂S)V=T, (∂U/∂V)S=−P
H(S,P)U + PVdH = TdS + VdP(∂H/∂S)P=T, (∂H/∂P)S=V
A(T,V)U − TSdA = −SdT − PdV(∂A/∂T)V=−S, (∂A/∂V)T=−P
G(T,P)H − TSdG = −SdT + VdP(∂G/∂T)P=−S, (∂G/∂P)T=V

8.2 Key working formulae

QuantityFormula
First lawΔU = q + w; w = −∫PextdV
Enthalpy linkΔH = ΔU + ΔngasRT (ideal gas, const T)
Isothermal rev. work (ideal)w = −nRT ln(V₂/V₁)
Adiabatic rev. (ideal)PVγ=const; TVγ−1=const; w=CVΔT
MayerCP,m − CV,m = R
Entropy (heating)ΔS = nC ln(T₂/T₁) (C = CV,m or CP,m — the molar heat capacity, since the n already sits outside)
Entropy (isothermal, ideal)ΔS = nR ln(V₂/V₁) = −nR ln(P₂/P₁)
Carnotη = 1 − Tc/Th
Clausius inequalitydS ≥ δq/T; ΔSuniv ≥ 0
Gibbs–Helmholtz[∂(ΔG/T)/∂T]P = −ΔH/T²
Reaction Gibbs energyΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q; ΔG° = −RT ln K
van't Hoffln(K₂/K₁) = −(ΔH°/R)(1/T₂−1/T₁)
Clausius–Clapeyronln(P₂/P₁) = −(ΔHvap/R)(1/T₂−1/T₁)
Clapeyron (exact)dP/dT = ΔHtrs/(TΔVtrs)
KirchhoffΔH(T₂)=ΔH(T₁)+∫ΔCPdT
Electro-thermoΔG°=−nFE°=−RT ln K
Joule–ThomsonμJT=(1/CP)[T(∂V/∂T)P−V]

8.3 The four Maxwell relations (sign map)

SourceRelationMnemonic
U(∂T/∂V)S = −(∂P/∂S)Vno cross-sign shortcut — derive from dU
H(∂T/∂P)S = +(∂V/∂S)Pboth "natural pair" positive
A(∂S/∂V)T = +(∂P/∂T)Vthe workhorse (→ internal pressure)
G(∂S/∂P)T = −(∂V/∂T)Pthe workhorse (→ S vs P, J–T)

9. Revision summary — the results worth memorising & the four diagrams ▲ top

Use this as your last pass before the exam. Every line below is a result derived earlier in the guide, written in the form you should be able to reproduce from a blank page.

  1. Sign convention — this guide uses ΔU = q + w with w = work done on the system (§1.2 note). If your course writes w = work done by the gas, every isothermal-work sign flips, so settle the convention before touching a first-law problem.
  2. CP−CV = TVα²/κT is the general result for any substance; it collapses to R per mole for an ideal gas (§1.4).
  3. Ice residual entropy is R ln(3/2) ≈ 3.37 J K⁻¹mol⁻¹ on Pauling’s counting (§2.3), which reproduces the measured ~3.4.
  4. Water’s melting line slopes backwards (§4.2): dP/dT = ΔHfus/(TΔVfus) is negative because ΔVfus < 0 — ice is less dense than water.
  5. P5 adiabat: T₂ = 300×22/3 = 476.2 K and w = +2198 J. Keep 22/3 = 1.5874 in memory; it appears constantly for monatomic gases.
  6. P7 van’t Hoff: doubling K between 300 K and 310 K requires ΔH° = +53.6 kJ/mol — a useful feel for how little enthalpy a big change in K needs.
  7. P8 Clausius–Clapeyron: a fourfold rise in vapour pressure from 300 K to 340 K gives ΔHvap = +29.4 kJ/mol.
  8. P9 Daniell: ΔG° = −212.3 kJ/mol, ln K = 85.67, so K ≈ 1.6×10³⁷ — proof of how steeply K responds to a cell potential of only 1.10 V.
  9. P10 Kirchhoff: ΔCP = −45.3 J/K gives ΔH°(398) = −96.7 kJ; the CP values are 298 K standards treated as constant.
  10. The ΔG°(500 K) example in §4: the direct route and the van’t Hoff route both land on K ≈ 6.9, as they must whenever ΔH° and ΔS° are taken temperature-independent.
  11. Joule–Thomson (C3): μJT = (1/CP)[T(∂V/∂T)P − V] is zero for an ideal gas, positive (cooling on expansion) below the inversion temperature and negative above it. H₂ and He have inversion temperatures far below room temperature, so they warm on ordinary throttling.

The four diagrams, and the one idea each of them carries:

  1. Fig T-1 — reversible vs irreversible isothermal work: the work is the area under the path on a P–V plot, and the reversible path encloses the larger area.
  2. Fig T-2 — the Carnot cycle: two isotherms joined by two adiabats, η = 1 − Tc/Th, and ΔS = 0 once round the closed loop.
  3. Fig T-3 — G against extent of reaction: equilibrium is the minimum of the curve, where ΔGrxn = (∂G/∂ξ)T,P = 0 — not where G itself is zero.
  4. Fig T-4 — the van’t Hoff plot of ln K against 1/T: the slope is −ΔH°/R, so an endothermic reaction falls and an exothermic reaction rises as you move to the right.

All four diagrams are drawn inline, so they print and display with no external images. Redraw each one freehand from memory: if you can place the axes, the curve shapes and the slope signs unaided, you own the section.

Where to go from here

This guide is free in full. The other guides, the books, the study notes and 6,000+ practice questions with worked solutions come with ChemVidya Full Access.

See plans   Read it in the app